SC Ruling On User Development Fee Provides Guidance For GST,
SC Ruling On User Development Fee Provides Guidance For GST, Tax On Royalty
|
The SC had held that UDF collected by the DIAL is in the nature of statutory levy and the same would not be taken as consideration against any services.
A recent judgment by the Supreme Court (SC) on the user development fee (UDF) collected by the Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL) may have ramifications on the goods and services tax (GST) as well as the income tax on royalty etc.
Last week, the apex court had held that UDF collected by the DIAL is in the nature of statutory levy and the same would not be taken as consideration against any services.
As such, no service tax is payable on UDF, the court ruled.
As such, no service tax is payable on UDF, the court ruled.
In determining that the fee collected by the DIAL is in the nature of statutory levy, the court had laid down some principles.
Firstly, UDF is collected for the development of future establishment at the airport and no additional benefit is accrued to passengers, visitors, traders, and airlines upon levy of this fee. Thus, the UDF is in the form of ‘tax or cess’, collected for financing the cost of future projects and the same cannot be taken as consideration for services provided to the customer, visitors, passengers, vendors etc.
Secondly, the collection is not premised on the rendering of any service.
Thirdly, the amounts collected are deposited in an escrow account, not within the control of the assessee.
Fourthly, the utilization of funds is monitored and regulated by law.
Though the ruling related to the pre-GST matter, experts said the principles laid down by the SC should be applied to the GST too.
“The impact of principles laid down in the judgment would need to be analyzed under the GST legislation which specifically provides that statutory levies other than GST collected by the supplier would form part of the value of supply,” said Saurabh Agarwal, tax partner at EY.
Besides, the principles may be used for determining whether the tax be paid on royalty etc, he said.
“These may be useful in determining whether the consideration in the form of fee, royalty, etc collected by the government from business entities would be in the nature of the statutory levy or the same would be considered as a consideration against any services,” he said.
Source..
Source..
Post Categories
Featured Posts
Latest Posts
Latest Posts
Repatriation of Funds Guidelines for NRIs...
nbsp Navigating the repatriation of funds as a Non-Resident Indian NRI can be complex but understanding the guidelines can simplify the process and ensure compliance with Indian regulations Here's a comprehensive overview to help NRIs manage their finances effectively...
Adultery No Longer A Criminal Offence In India Rules Supreme Court...
The Rajya Sabha has passed the Jammu and Kashmir The court underlined that Section treats women as properties of their husbands and is hence manifestly discriminatory It trashed the central government rsquo s defense of Section that it protects sanctity...
ADR in Workplace Conflicts A Guide for Employers and Employees...
Workplace conflicts are inevitable Whether stemming from miscommunication differences in expectations or interpersonal issues they can disrupt the professional environment and affect productivity For both employers and employees finding a way to resolve these conflicts quickly fairly and cost-effectively is...
Documents Can Be Produced During Cross-Examination In Civil Trial To Confront Party To Suit...
In a notable judgment the Supreme Court has held that a document can produced during cross-examination in a civil trial to confront a party to the suit or a witness The Court also held that there is no distinction between...
ADR in Family Law Benefits and Challenges...
Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR has become a pivotal tool in family law offering a way to resolve disputes without the need for contentious court battles At Eos Chambers we've observed the growing reliance on ADR methods such as mediation arbitration...
Motor Accident Claims No Right To Recovery For Insurer Merely Because Vehicle Owner Didn't...
The Supreme Court on Monday th October held that an insurance company cannot claim that it is not liable to pay compensation in a motor vehicle accident claim just because the vehicle owner did not verify the genuineness of the...
Speak With Our
Get a Appointment