Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.
Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.
“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.
Introduction Indian Constitutional Law is the backbone of the country's legal system laying down the framework for governance rights and duties of citizens and the functioning of various institutions Enshrined in the Constitution of India adopted on January...
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that not all marriages require a public declaration or solemnisation Not every valid marriage requires a public declaration or solemnisation in a particular manner the Supreme Court held on Monday as it underlined...
The rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology has revolutionized the financial world but it has also brought about a series of complex legal challenges As more businesses and individuals adopt digital currencies and decentralized systems governments and regulatory bodies are...
The Rajya Sabha has passed the Jammu and Kashmir The court underlined that Section treats women as properties of their husbands and is hence manifestly discriminatory It trashed the central government rsquo s defense of Section that it protects sanctity...
The Supreme Court observed that an insurance is expected to deal with the insured in a bonafide and fair manner and should not just care for and cater to its own profits It is the duty of the insurance company...
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud recently spoke on how justice and the outcome of the law depends on who is wielding the law in their hands When the law is wielded with compassion it is capable of producing justice...