The Supreme Court has said a five-judge constitution bench will examine whether Parliament can “abrogate the constitutional principles of governance” for the Delhi government by making a law to take away its control over services. The Centre recently issued an ordinance on the Delhi services matter by exercising its powers under Article 239-AA, a special provision in the Constitution pertaining to the national capital.
The top court, which on Thursday referred to a constitution bench the :
(i) What are the contours of the power of Parliament to enact a law under Article 239-AA(7); and (ii) Whether Parliament in the exercise of its power under Article 239-AA(7) can abrogate the constitutional principles of governance for the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD),” said the order passed by a bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices P S Narasimha and Manoj Misra.
“The first is on the import of Section 3A (of the ordinance). Section 3A removes Entry 41 (services) of List II (State List) from the legislative competence of the NCTD. On the exclusion of Entry 41 from the NCTD’s legislative power, the government of the NCTD ceases to have executive power over services because executive power is co-terminus with the legislative power,” the order said.
While referring the Delhi government’s plea to the constitution bench, it had rejected the vehement submission of the city dispensation that there was no need for referring the matter to a constitution bench as it will “paralyse the whole system” during its pendency.
On Thursday, the bench raised a raised a query with regard to the ordinance and said it took away the control of services from the control of the Delhi government.
The Constitution excludes three entries of List II (State List) related to police, law and order and land from the control of the Delhi government, it said.
Article 239AA deals with special provisions with respect to Delhi in the Constitution and its sub-article 7 says, “Parliament may, by law, make provisions for giving effect to, or supplementing the provisions contained in the foregoing clauses and for all matters incidental or consequential thereto.”
It also says any such law made under the article “shall not be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of Article 368 notwithstanding that it contains any provision which amends or has the effect of amending, this Constitution.”
Introduction In the realm of legal proceedings witness testimony can make or break a case It's the narrative that often tips the scales of justice Yet preparing witnesses for the courtroom is a nuanced art mdash one that demands expertise...
The Rajya Sabha has passed the JThe Supreme Court has noted that children born out of irregular marriages including one between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman are legitimate and therefore eligible to inherit intestate property as per applicable...
Introduction India has emerged as a popular destination for medical tourism attracting patients from across the globe seeking high-quality healthcare services at affordable costs While the country offers world-class medical facilities and skilled healthcare professionals it's essential for overseas patients...
Article of the Constitution gives individuals the right to approach the Supreme Court if they feel their fundamental rights have been violated Supreme Court on Tuesday deprecated the trend of the accused in money laundering cases using Article...
The arbitration law has undergone repeated amendments with only one aim mdash making India the hub of international arbitration Last month the government set up an expert panel headed by former law secretary TK Viswanathan to suggest reforms in the...
The rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology has revolutionized the financial world but it has also brought about a series of complex legal challenges As more businesses and individuals adopt digital currencies and decentralized systems governments and regulatory bodies are...