Supreme Court To Form Panel Of Experts To Evaluate “Carryi

Supreme Court To Form Panel Of Experts To Evaluate “Carrying Capacity” Of Hilly Areas

Supreme Court To Form Panel Of Experts To Evaluate “Carrying Capacity” Of Hilly Areas

In order to determine the “carrying capacity” of overcrowded hill stations in Uttarakhand, Himachal, and other Himalayan states affected by landslides, the Supreme Court on Monday decided to form a panel of experts on environment and climate studies from government institutions.

A bench led by Hon’ble Chief Justice called it an “important issue” and further asked the Centre as well as the petitioner to suggest the work sphere of the committee. The plea has been filed by Advocate Akash Vashisht for Ashok Kumar Raghav.

 “We cannot wait for all the states to respond to the Centre’s template. After the Centre receives the responses from the States, it can collate it and give the court its suggestions. Simultaneously, the expert body can assess the carrying capacity of the Himalayan States”, Court said while listing the matter on August 28, for orders.

In response to the Supreme Court’s recommendation that an expert committee be established to determine carrying capacity of hill stations, Additional Solicitor General Ms. Aishwarya Bhati informed that the Union Government had already framed a template for hill stations in all states, based on directives from the National Green Tribunal and requested their response as “land”, as a subject, fell under jurisdiction of the states.

The matter relates to a PIL seeking direction to the Union for determining “carrying capacity of all ecologically fragile areas, hill stations, high-altitude areas, highly visited areas and tourist destinations in all the 12 states/UTs in the Himalayan region in terms of tourist inflow and its impact, vehicular traffic, scarcity of ground and surface water, impact on air, water, trees, forests and biodiversity as well as climate, along with availability of waste management infrastructure and healthcare facilities”.

Case Title: Ashok Kumar Raghav Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Source

Latest News Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

Can AI-Generated Content Be Copyrighted in India?

Understanding Copyright Ownership, AI-Assisted Creation, Originality and the Emerging Legal Position Artificial Intelligence has fundamentally changed the way content is created. Today, a person can use an AI tool to generate a blog article, photograph, illustration, advertisement, music composition, video, ...

Card image

Estate Planning and Succession Laws for NRIs: A Comprehensive Guide

Estate Planning and Succession Laws for NRIs: A Comprehensive Guide Estate planning is not just a necessity; it's a critical step in securing your family’s future, ensuring the seamless transfer of assets, and minimizing legal complications. For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), ...

Card image

AI and Big Data in Legal Case Management

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data into legal case management is revolutionizing the way law firms and legal professionals operate. These technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to streamline processes, enhance decision-making, and improve client outcomes. The Role of ...

Card image

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Independent Audit Of EVM Source Codes

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an independent audit of source codes of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). The bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra noted that ...

Card image

Stubble Burning One Reason For Delhi Air Pollution, Says CAQM; Supreme Court Seeks Affidavits From Punjab, Haryana, UP, Rajasthan

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (October 31) asked the Governments of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Delhi to file affidavits setting forth the steps they have taken to control air pollution including the measures to curb crop burning. This ...

Card image

BREAKING| Supreme Court Issues Fresh Guidelines For Senior Designation; Previous Applicants Required To Update Or Submit Fresh Applications

The Supreme Court has issued fresh guidelines for the designation of senior advocates following the May 12 judgment in Indira Jaising vs Supreme Court which modified the criteria for senior designation. The Court has directed that Advocates-on-Record/Advocates who had applied in response ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law