The advent of virtual court hearings marks a significant evolution in the judicial system, reshaping traditional courtroom dynamics. While this shift brings efficiency and accessibility, it also introduces unique challenges and opportunities that require careful consideration within the legal framework.
The Rise of Virtual Court Hearings
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual hearings in India, with courts embracing technology to ensure the continuity of justice delivery. Platforms like Cisco Webex and Zoom became integral to legal proceedings, allowing cases to proceed despite physical restrictions.
Legal Framework Governing Virtual Courts
Opportunities with Virtual Hearings
Challenges in Virtual Hearings
Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Virtual Court Systems
Future Outlook
The incorporation of virtual court hearings is not merely a response to a crisis but a step toward a more modern judiciary. A balanced approach that addresses challenges while leveraging the benefits of technology can pave the way for a judicial system that is more inclusive, efficient, and accessible.
By embracing innovation, India’s judiciary can set a global benchmark for justice delivery in the digital age.
The Supreme Court has held that if an Indian Entity rsquo s Establishment is operating in Oman and has a lsquo Permanent Establishment rsquo status under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ldquo DTAA rdquo then the dividend income received by the...
In a rapidly growing business ecosystem safeguarding sensitive information is paramount For Indian businesses Non-Disclosure Agreements NDAs have become crucial legal tools to protect trade secrets proprietary information client details and more This article explores NDAs from an Indian legal...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the pleas filed by the Delhi Police against the bail granted to three student activists in the North East Delhi riots case A bench of nbsp Justices S K Kaul and A Amanullah nbsp...
A seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday December ruled that arbitration clauses in unstamped or inadequately stamped agreements are enforceable Insufficiency of stamping does not make the agreement void or unenforceable but makes it inadmissible in evidence...
The Supreme Court has reinstated an award originally granted by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal MACT The apex court expressed disappointment over the approach taken by the High Court in evaluating the evidence and reinstated the MACT rsquo s verdict...