Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk for Foreign Companies in I

Card image

Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk for Foreign Companies in India – 2026 Compliance Alert

By Team EOS |

Introduction: Why PE Risk Is a Serious Compliance Issue in 2026

India continues to witness heightened scrutiny of foreign companies operating through subsidiaries, employees, consultants, and digital presence. With increased data sharing, GST intelligence, and income-tax investigations, Permanent Establishment (PE) risk has become one of the most litigated international tax issues in India.

In 2026, foreign enterprises must reassess whether their India-linked activities cross the PE threshold under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA)—particularly Article 5.

Failure to evaluate PE exposure can lead to:

  • Back-dated tax demands
  • Interest and penalties
  • Prosecution exposure for key managerial personnel


What Is Permanent Establishment (PE)?

A Permanent Establishment refers to a fixed place of business or business presence through which a foreign enterprise partly or wholly carries on business in India, making it taxable in India.

Under most DTAAs signed by India, PE is governed by Article 5, which overrides domestic tax law where applicable.


Types of Permanent Establishment Recognised in India

1. Fixed Place PE

Triggered when a foreign company has:

  • Office, branch, factory, warehouse
  • Project office or liaison office exceeding permitted activities
  • Premises used regularly for business operations

Key Test: 👉 Degree of permanence + business activity


2. Dependent Agent PE (DAPE)

A PE may arise if an Indian person/entity:

  • Habitually concludes contracts on behalf of foreign company
  • Plays a principal role leading to contract conclusion
  • Works exclusively or almost exclusively for the foreign enterprise

Common Risk Areas

  • Indian subsidiaries acting as sales arms
  • Commission agents with decision-making authority


3. Service PE

Service PE may be triggered when:

  • Foreign employees or personnel render services in India
  • Services exceed prescribed time thresholds (often 90–183 days)

This is common in:

  • IT services
  • Management consultancy
  • Engineering and EPC contracts


4. Subsidiary PE – A Hidden Risk

While a subsidiary is a separate legal entity, courts have repeatedly held that functions performed by the Indian subsidiary may create PE of the foreign holding company if:

  • Subsidiary acts as an extension of the foreign company
  • Key decisions are controlled offshore
  • Indian entity performs core revenue-generating functions

Important Note: 👉 Mere ownership does not create PE, but conduct does.


Business Connection vs Permanent Establishment

Many foreign companies assume “business connection” under Indian Income Tax Act is enough for tax exposure.

However:

  • DTAA Article 5 governs PE
  • Treaty provisions override domestic law
  • Taxability arises only if PE exists under DTAA

Yet, tax authorities often invoke both concepts simultaneously, increasing litigation risk.


Recent Trends: Why PE Litigation Is Increasing

In 2026, PE exposure is rising due to:

  • Remote work & digital operations
  • Cross-border management control
  • Shared resources between group entities
  • Aggressive transfer pricing adjustments
  • Exchange of information between tax jurisdictions


Consequences of PE Trigger in India

If PE is established:

  • Profits attributable to PE become taxable in India
  • Mandatory tax registration & filings
  • Transfer pricing compliance required
  • Interest, penalties & prosecution risk

In some cases, retrospective tax demands have been raised for multiple years.


How Foreign Companies Can Mitigate PE Risk

✔ Review India-linked activities annually

✔ Clearly define scope of Indian subsidiary

✔ Avoid contract-concluding authority in India

✔ Maintain functional & risk separation

✔ Document arm’s length transactions

✔ Seek advance rulings or professional opinions


Conclusion: Proactive PE Assessment Is No Longer Optional

For foreign companies, Permanent Establishment risk in India is not theoretical—it is real, litigated, and costly.

In 2026, compliance planning, not reactive litigation, is the smartest approach. A structured PE risk review aligned with DTAA Article 5 can protect businesses from prolonged disputes and financial exposure.

Articles

Latest Posts

Card image

E-Courts The Future of Judiciary in India...

India rsquo s judiciary is at a crossroads with digitization and judicial reforms paving the way for increased efficiency transparency and accessibility The e-Courts initiative launched by the Indian judiciary under the National e-Governance Plan NeGP is a transformative step...

Card image

SC Issues Notice On PIL Seeking Action Against Doctors Who Do Not Prescribe Generic...

The plea said that affordability of medicines is a vital factor that contributes to effective healthcare delivery and the realization of the lsquo right to health rsquo The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a PIL seeking disciplinary actions...

Card image

Empowering NRIs with Insights into Taxes Investments and Banking Regulations...

Introduction The financial landscape for Non-Resident Indians NRIs is complex spanning a myriad of regulations taxes and investment opportunities As global citizens NRIs navigate diverse economic ecosystems balancing rights and responsibilities across borders In this article we delve into the...

Card image

Navigating Cyber Crime Laws in India A Legal Perspective...

The rapid proliferation of digital technologies has transformed India rsquo s social economic and professional landscape While digitalization brings efficiency and innovation it also exposes individuals and businesses to cybercrime risks As a lawyer in India it is crucial to...

Card image

DBS Bank Directors Can t Be Prosecuted For Acts Of Lakshmi Vilas Bank Before...

The Supreme Court today ruled that DBS Bank and its directors who were appointed after the amalgamation with Lakshmi Vilas Bank LVB and had their appointments approved by the Reserve Bank of India RBI cannot be held criminally liable for...

Card image

Marriages Don t Require Public Declaration SC...

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that not all marriages require a public declaration or solemnisation Not every valid marriage requires a public declaration or solemnisation in a particular manner the Supreme Court held on Monday as it underlined...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law