The Supreme Court refused to entertain an appeal challenging Madras High Court’s order that stated that individuals forwarding messages on social media are liable for its contents. The order was in connection with a batch of criminal proceedings against BJP politician S Ve Shekher for his remarks against women journalists. He had allegedly forwarded derogatory comments on his Facebook account in 2018.
The Madras High Court had noted that Shekher was a person of high stature and had many followers. It stated that he should have exercised more caution when forwarding messages, according to a report in LiveLaw.
Shekher argued that he forwarded the message without reading it, but removed it later on. He also offered apologies. The high court stated that that does not help Shekher from facing the consequences.
It must be construed that the person who sent the message acknowledged its contents, the court said. If the person forwarding the messages got a dopamine high then he or she should be ready to face the consequences too.
Shekher argued that he forwarded the message without reading it, but removed it later on. He also offered apologies. The high court stated that that does not help Shekher from facing the consequences.
It must be construed that the person who sent the message acknowledged its contents, the court said. If the person forwarding the messages got a dopamine high then he or she should be ready to face the consequences too.
The Supreme Court while acquitting a convict in a dowry death case emphasized the critical importance of ensuring that a dying declaration is trustworthy and reliable and inspires confidence when it is considered the sole basis for a criminal conviction...
NEW DELHI Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud batted on Friday for adopting and encouraging mediation including online mediation as a mode of dispute resolution other than litigation saying it would reduce the courts rsquo caseload and has the potential...
The Supreme Court has issued fresh guidelines for the designation of senior advocates following the May judgment in nbsp Indira Jaising vs Supreme Court nbsp which modified the criteria for senior designation The Court has directed that Advocates-on-Record Advocates who...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday October asked the Governments of Punjab Haryana Uttar Pradesh Rajasthan and Delhi to file affidavits setting forth the steps they have taken to control air pollution including the measures to curb crop burning This...
nbsp Navigating the repatriation of funds as a Non-Resident Indian NRI can be complex but understanding the guidelines can simplify the process and ensure compliance with Indian regulations Here's a comprehensive overview to help NRIs manage their finances effectively...
The Supreme Court on Friday September pronounced a judgment recognizing the rights of children born out of invalid marriages in their parents rsquo share in Hindu joint family property The Court held that children born out of void voidable marriages...