In a Criminal Appeal arising out of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Supreme Court has ruled that once the settlement has been arrived at and the complainant has signed the deed, the proceedings under this provision must be quashed.
"Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that once the settlement has been arrived at and the complainant has signed the deed accepting a particular amount in full and final settlement of the default amount and the fine amount awarded by the Trial Court, the proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act need to be quashed," observed the bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Satish Chandra Sharma.
The instant appeal was filed challenging the September 13, 2017, order passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla Bench. By its impugned order, the High Court had upheld the conviction of the accused persons/ the present petitioners under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.
However, in the meantime, a compromise deed was entered between the parties. As per this deed, the respondent-complainant agreed to accept a certain amount as full and final settlement of the cheque amount and the fine imposed by the Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court.
The Supreme Court on Friday raised serious concerns over the delays in the adoption process and the potential impact on both aspiring parents and children in need of loving homes The remarks came from a bench comprising CJI DY...
The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud while announcing his verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding legal status to same-sex marriages today struck down the Central Adoption Resource Authority's...
The Supreme Court on Thursday October set aside the conviction and death sentence of a man accused of kidnapping raping and murdering a three-month-old infant after noting that he had not been give a 'proper opportunity' to defend himself...
lsquo Judges can rsquo t burden lawyers due to uneasiness with technology rsquo CJI Chandrachud- CJI Chandrachud appealed to judges to continue hybrid hearings saying that this was not just meant for the Covid- pandemic period Chief Justice of India...
The Supreme Court on Monday th October held that an insurance company cannot claim that it is not liable to pay compensation in a motor vehicle accident claim just because the vehicle owner did not verify the genuineness of the...
Rents receivable by a borrower can be assigned to a lender as an actionable claim as per the Transfer of Property Act TPA held the Supreme Court while deciding a dispute between the Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd and...