The Supreme Court on Monday(September 25) refused to interfere with the interim order passed by the Delhi High Court allowing the University of Delhi to admit students in the 5 year LL.B course of its Faculty of Law on the basis of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT).
Noting that the classes have already commenced, a bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud dismissed the special leave petition filed by a student, who demanded that the admission should be on the basis of the Common University Entrance Test (CUET) held by the University for other courses. CLAT is conducted by the Consortium of National Law Universities.
"This is an interlocutory order, we cannot interfere. You can argue in the High court. HC will consider it for the next year. For this year, HC thought let CLAT reign", CJI said.
On September 18, a division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula passed the interim order permitting the Delhi University to offer admissions in its newly introduced five-year integrated law courses on the basis of CLAT-UG 2023 score, only for the current academic year. The court was hearing a PIL challenging Delhi University’s decision to offer the said admissions solely on the basis of CLAT-UG 2023 score, instead of CUET.
The bench observed that the matter requires consideration and listed it for hearing for a broader question i.e. whether CUET should be mandatory for admissions in all Central Universities or if such varsities are at a liberty to admit students through other examinations conducted by other specialized agencies.
“However, for the present academic year 2023-24, as classes have already started, by way of interim relief, DU is permitted to admit students to its Five Year Integrated Law Course based on CLAT UG 2023,” the High Court ordered.
The Supreme Court today ruled that DBS Bank and its directors who were appointed after the amalgamation with Lakshmi Vilas Bank LVB and had their appointments approved by the Reserve Bank of India RBI cannot be held criminally liable for...
In a notable judgment the Supreme Court has held that a document can produced during cross-examination in a civil trial to confront a party to the suit or a witness The Court also held that there is no distinction between...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the pleas filed by the Delhi Police against the bail granted to three student activists in the North East Delhi riots case A bench of nbsp Justices S K Kaul and A Amanullah nbsp...
The Supreme Court emphasized that where there is an absence of any specific rule or prescription the last day for fulfilling eligibility is the last date of submission of the application The Court made the observation while refusing the benefit...
The of India has recently delivered a judgment of far-reaching significance in the context of corruption prosecutions involving Central Government employees Although the matter was argued on behalf of the petitioner and the decision ultimately went against us...
The Supreme Court ruled that Aadhaar the ambitious public scheme that uses biometric data to generate unique identification numbers for citizens is constitutionally valid but with conditions Here are the key takeaways from today rsquo s verdict Read More nbsp...