'No right for queer couples to jointly adopt’: SC in same-

Card image

'No right for queer couples to jointly adopt’: SC in same-sex marriage verdict

By Admin |

The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, while announcing his verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding legal status to same-sex marriages, today struck down the Central Adoption Resource Authority's (CARA) regulation that restricted queer and unmarried couples from adopting children. The five-judge bench, however, in a 3:2 verdict, ruled that non-heterosexual couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.
CJI Chandrachud said it couldn't be assumed only "heterosexual married couples can be good parents".

CARA is a statutory body affiliated to the Ministry of Women and Child Development. It is the nodal body for adoption of Indian children. It regulates and monitors all adoptions taking place in India, including inter-country adoptions.

The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting, and that the Union of India hadn't proven restricting unmarried couples from adopting was in the best interest of children. "CARA has exceeded its authority in barring unmarried couples," he said.

"Differentia between married couples and unmarried couples has no reasonable nexus with the objective of CARA - the best interests of the child," CJI Chandrachud said.

He said the CARA circular (which excludes queer couples from adoption) is violative of Article 15 of the Constitution, reported Live Law.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to grant legal recognition to same-sax marriages, holding that it is only for Parliament and state legislatures to create such institutions and grant them legal validation.

The Constitution bench -- comprising CJI Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha -- were unanimous in their judgement that it was beyond the remit of courts to issue a positive direction to the legislature to accord legal recognition to same-sex marriages.

The court refused to change the meaning of the Special Marriage Act. However, it declared queer couples have the right to cohabit without any threat of violence, coercion or interference.

Three of the five judges ruled there can't be a right to form civil unions. By the same majority, the court also held that non-heterosexual couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.

 

Latest News Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

Understanding Indian Constitutional Laws A Brief Overview...

Introduction Indian Constitutional Law is the backbone of the country's legal system laying down the framework for governance rights and duties of citizens and the functioning of various institutions Enshrined in the Constitution of India adopted on January...

Card image

Recruitment Process -Last Date To Fulfil Eligibility Criteria Is Last Date To Submit Applications...

The Supreme Court emphasized that where there is an absence of any specific rule or prescription the last day for fulfilling eligibility is the last date of submission of the application The Court made the observation while refusing the benefit...

Card image

Section CrPC 'Right To Remain Silent Not Be Used Against Accused' Supreme Court Summarises...

Recently the Supreme Court in a noteworthy judgment while acquitting a woman accused of killing her own child and was convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment also decided the question of what may be required of the convict...

Card image

SC Divorce Can Be Granted On Grounds Of Irretrievable Breakdown...

The Supreme Court on May held that it can use its extraordinary powers to do ldquo complete justice rdquo under Article of the Constitution and dissolve a marriage on the ground of lsquo irretrievable breakdown rsquo of the union Usually...

Card image

EVMs Non-Tamperable Demand For VVPAT Verification Regressive Election Commission Tells Supreme Court...

Ahead of the Lok Sabha elections the Election Commission of India ECI has staunchly defended electronic voting machines EVM as lsquo non-tamperable rsquo both owing to technological measures and strict administrative and security procedures designed by the commission In a...

Card image

NEET-PG Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Reduction Of NEET-PG Qualifying Percentile To Zero...

The Supreme Court on Monday September dismissed a petition challenging the decision of the Union Government to reduce the cut-off for post-graduate medical college admissions through NEET-PG exam as zero percentile A bench comprising dismissed a PIL filed...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law