Supreme Court Grants Extension Till September 30 To Delhi Go

Card image

Supreme Court Grants Extension Till September 30 To Delhi Government For Finalisation Of Scheme : Two Wheeler Aggregators

By Team EOS |

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Delhi government to finalise the Delhi Motor Vehicle Aggregator and Delivery Service Provider Scheme, 2023 for regulation of two wheeler aggregators by September 30.

The Division Bench of Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Bela M. Trivedi granted extension to the Delhi government for finalisation of scheme on request of its Counsel.

However, the Apex Court pointed out that during the previous hearing, the Delhi Government had taken an ‘emphatic stand by,’ submitting that the policy would be notified by July 31.

Earlier on June 12, The Supreme Court on Monday directed bike taxi aggregators such as Rapido and Uber to stop plying bike taxis on the roads of the national capital till the guidelines governing grant of licences to such aggregators was notified

The Vacation Bench of Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Rajesh Bindal set aside two orders of the Delhi High Court, which had directed the Delhi government not to take any coercive action against bike taxi aggregators till the government notified guidelines governing the same.

The Apex Court observed that a complete stay on the Delhi government notification that prohibited the operation of bike taxis was unwarranted since the Delhi government was in the process of formulating a policy for granting licences to bike taxi aggregators.

While staying the High Court orders, the top court of the country directed the High Court to hear the challenge to the notification expeditiously.

It further gave liberty to the parties to file early hearing applications before the High Court.

Appearing for the Delhi government, Senior Advocate Manish Vashisht contended that the aggregators were operating two-wheelers without proper licences or permits, as required under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

It was argued that non-transport two-wheelers should not be used as taxis without a policy in place.

He further submitted that the Delhi government was working on a policy on licensing regime, which would become operational by July 31, 2023.

Representing Uber, Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul submitted that the company had relied on notifications permitting two-wheelers to operate in many states since 2019.

He emphasised that the government’s failure to draft a policy should not lead to a ban on the existing 35,000 bike taxi operators.

The issue of whether two-wheelers fit into the existing taxi aggregator policy was also raised. Uber argued that two-wheelers, except those with engine capacities of 25CC, should be allowed to operate as commercial vehicles based on a notification by the Central government.

Appearing for the Central government, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain said that the Centre’s guidelines were issued to facilitate state governments, so that they could formulate a policy for licences to aggregators.

The High Court of Delhi had ordered the Delhi government in May not to take any coercive action against the bike taxi aggregators such as Rapido and Uber, giving them permission to operate till guidelines governing such aggregators were notified.

In February this year, the Delhi government had issued a public notice stating that bike taxis were not allowed in the national capital.

The government pointed out that two-wheelers having non-transport (private) registration indulging in purely commercial operations would be in violation of the Motor Vehicles Act and rules made under the Act.

(Case title: Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors vs Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd and Ors) 

Latest News Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

Documents Can Be Produced During Cross-Examination In Civil Trial To Confront Party To Suit...

In a notable judgment the Supreme Court has held that a document can produced during cross-examination in a civil trial to confront a party to the suit or a witness The Court also held that there is no distinction between...

Card image

...

YES mdash like proven misconduct criminal activity or if the employment contract specifically permits termination without notice and state-specific Shops amp Establishment Acts arbitrary dismissal can invite legal...

Card image

Legal Framework for Virtual Court Hearings Challenges and Opportunities...

The advent of virtual court hearings marks a significant evolution in the judicial system reshaping traditional courtroom dynamics While this shift brings efficiency and accessibility it also introduces unique challenges and opportunities that require careful consideration within the legal framework...

Card image

Grant Of Bail Can't Be Made Dependent On Surrender Of Co-Accused Supreme Court...

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court while allowing a bail plea held that the grant of bail to a co-accused person cannot be contingent on the surrender of another accused who is also pertinently the main accused in the...

Card image

Navigating the Latest GDPR Updates What Solicitors Need to Know...

The General Data Protection Regulation GDPR remains a cornerstone of data protection in the EU Since its implementation in several updates have refined its application addressing evolving data privacy concerns For solicitors understanding these changes is crucial for advising...

Card image

Supreme Court To Form Panel Of Experts To Evaluate Carrying Capacity Of Hilly Areas...

In order to determine the nbsp ldquo carrying capacity rdquo nbsp of overcrowded hill stations in Uttarakhand Himachal and other Himalayan states affected by landslides the Supreme Court on Monday decided to form a panel of experts on environment and...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law