Central Civil Service Rules , Retired Employee Can Be Appoin

Card image

Central Civil Service Rules , Retired Employee Can Be Appointed As Inquiry Authority In Disciplinary Proceedings…

By Team EOS |

The Supreme Court recently held that the disciplinary authority under the Central Civil Service Rules is empowered to appoint a retired employee as an inquiry authority. It is not necessary that the inquiry officer should be a public servant.

The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Bela M Trivedi was hearing an appeal against Odisha HC judgment which relied on  Ravi Malik v. National Film Development Corporation to hold that a retired public servant could not have been appointed as an inquiry officer.

The Court distinguished it and said it wouldn’t be applicable in the present case. In that case, Rule 23(b) of Service Regulations,1982 of NFDC was applicable which specifically stated that the disciplinary authority may appoint a “public servant” to inquire into the misconduct of an employee. Whereas in this case, Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services, 1965 would apply where disciplinary authority may appoint an “authority” to inquire into the misconduct of a govt employee.

The court held thus “Therefore, the disciplinary authority is empowered to appoint a retired employee as an inquiry authority. It is not necessary that the inquiry officer should be a public servant. Hence, no fault can be found as the inquiry officer was not a public servant, but a retired officer.”

The Court also referred to Union of India v. PC Ramakrishnnaya which made a reference precedent set in The court noted that the Alok Kumar case had made it clear that Rule 9(3) used the word “other authority” and not “public servant” who may conduct an inquiry. It observed, “a retired officer could also be vested with the delegated authority of the disciplinary authority to hold the inquiry.

The Court therefore allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment of HC which had upheld the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack bench.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
The respondent Jagdish Chandra Sethy had assailed the order of disciplinary authority before Central Administrative Tribunal at Cuttack. He contended that the authority had not recorded specific reasons why a retired government servant was appointed to act as an inquiry officer. The tribunal agreed and passed an order in his favor. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant approached the High Court which, again upheld the order of the tribunal.

Source

Latest News Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

2020 Delhi Riots: SC Dismisses Delhi Police’s Pleas Against HC Verdicts Granting Bail To Three Student Activists

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the pleas filed by the Delhi Police against the bail granted to three student activists in the 2020 North East Delhi riots case. A bench of Justices S K Kaul and A Amanullah passed the order ...

Card image

Adolescent Privacy Rights: A Critical Issue in India’s Evolving Digital Landscape

The rapid advancement of technology has transformed the lives of adolescents in India, providing unprecedented access to information, social connectivity, and learning tools. However, this digital revolution has also created a complex challenge—safeguarding the privacy of adolescents who are increasingly ...

Card image

Startups and Legal Compliance: A Guide to Navigating Indian Laws🏛️

Starting a business in India is an exciting journey filled with opportunities and challenges. One critical aspect that often poses a challenge for startups is navigating the complex landscape of legal compliance. Understanding and adhering to the various laws and ...

Card image

Supreme Court Grants Extension Till September 30 To Delhi Government For Finalisation Of Scheme : Two Wheeler Aggregators

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Delhi government to finalise the Delhi Motor Vehicle Aggregator and Delivery Service Provider Scheme, 2023 for regulation of two wheeler aggregators by September 30. The Division Bench of Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice ...

Card image

Legal Challenges in Remote Work : Solicitors' Guide

Introduction: As remote work continues to redefine the modern workplace, it brings with it a host of legal considerations that businesses and employees must navigate. From data protection to employment law and contractual obligations, the shift to remote work presents ...

Card image

In A First, Supreme Court Data Available On National Judicial Data Grid On Real Time Basis; Boost For Transparency, Says CJI DY Chandrachud

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud announced today that the Supreme Court is officially 'onboard' with the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) now. The CJI described the onboarding of the Supreme Court data on NJDG portal under the court's 'open ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law