Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract

Card image

Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC

By Admin |

Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.
The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal provisions just because a contract is in the name of the President of India, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
A bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, interpreted Article 299 of the Constitution to hold that the central government, as a party to a contract, cannot wriggle out of statutory bars by arguing that the contract is in the name of the President of India.

Article 299 provides that all contracts in the exercise of the executive power of the union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President or by the Governor of the State, and all such contracts will be executed by a person duly authorized in that behalf.

“Having considered the purpose and object of Article 299, we are of the clear opinion that a contract entered into in the name of the President of India, cannot and will not create an immunity against the application of any statutory prescription imposing conditions on parties to an agreement, when the Government chooses to enter into a contract,” held the judgment, authored by justice Narasimha.

Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

Legal Challenges in Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Exploring the Evolving Legal Landscape...

The rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology has revolutionized the financial world but it has also brought about a series of complex legal challenges As more businesses and individuals adopt digital currencies and decentralized systems governments and regulatory bodies are...

Card image

Understanding Section of the Indian Penal Code...

Section of the Indian Penal Code a colonial-era law criminalized unnatural offenses including consensual same-sex relationships However in a historic judgment on September the Supreme Court of India decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults marking a significant...

Card image

Buyer Not Complying With Timeline For Payment Can't Seek Specific Performance Of Agreement To...

The Supreme Court in a recent decision held that when a contract stipulates a specific time frame within which the consideration needs to be paid by the 'buyer' to execute the 'agreement to sale' by the 'seller' then the buyer...

Card image

KnowTheLaw Can NRIs Buy Agricultural Land in India...

No mdash NRIs are not allowed to purchase agricultural land plantation property or farmhouses in India as per RBI guidelines However they can inherit or receive such land as a gift from a resident Indian Important Violating this...

Card image

Supreme Court BCI Rules For Candidate Seeking Enrolment As Advocate To Have Completed Law...

The Supreme Court Friday held as valid the rules framed by the Bar Council of India requiring candidates seeking enrolment as an advocate to have completed their law course from a college recognized by the top Bar body A vacation...

Card image

Section CPC Executing Court Can Consider Only Questions Limited To Execution Of Decree Can't...

Lamenting the long delay in the execution of decrees the Supreme Court observed that under Section of the Code of Civil Procedure the Executing Court can only go into questions that are limited to the execution of decree and...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law