The Supreme Court of India has upheld the conviction of former MP, Rasheed Masood, in a disproportionate assets case, stating that the evidence against him was overwhelming. Background: Masood had been convicted by a special court in 2017 for possessing disproportionate assets. Parties: Masood had challenged his conviction, arguing that the evidence against him was not sufficient. Legal issues: The court considered whether the evidence against Masood was sufficient to prove his guilt. Court observations: The Supreme Court observed that the evidence against Masood was overwhelming, and that his conviction was justified. Significance: The judgment is significant as it highlights the need for accountability in public office, and is likely to have far-reaching implications for public servants who are involved in corrupt activities.