The Supreme Court of India has ruled that passive euthanasia is legally permissible in certain circumstances. Background: The case originated from a petition filed by a non-governmental organization, which sought to legalize euthanasia in India. Parties: The petitioners argued that the right to die with dignity is a fundamental right, while the respondents contended that euthanasia is morally and ethically wrong. Legal issues: The primary issue before the court was whether passive euthanasia is legally permissible in India. Court observations: The Supreme Court observed that passive euthanasia is permissible in cases where the patient is terminally ill and has no chance of recovery. Significance: The judgment has significant implications for the protection of the right to life and dignity, particularly in the context of end-of-life care.