A district court in Mumbai has rejected the bail plea of an accused in a cheating case. The accused had been arrested for allegedly cheating several investors of lakhs of rupees. The court has observed that the accused had a history of cheating and that there was a strong possibility of the accused fleeing from justice if granted bail. The court has also observed that the investigation in the case was still ongoing and that the accused's release on bail could interfere with the investigation. This order is significant as it highlights the importance of considering the possibility of the accused fleeing from justice when deciding on bail pleas. The district court's decision is also a relief for the investors who had been cheated by the accused. The court's emphasis on considering the possibility of the accused fleeing from justice is expected to ensure that accused persons do not escape from the law. The order is likely to have implications for other cases, where the accused have a history of cheating or other similar offenses. The district court's decision is also a reminder to courts to carefully consider the possibility of the accused fleeing from justice when deciding on bail pleas. The order is subject to appeal before the sessions court, although the district court's decision is likely to be a significant factor in any future proceedings. The district court has also directed the police to complete the investigation in the case within a specified timeframe. The court has observed that the investigation had been ongoing for several months and that it was necessary to complete the investigation as soon as possible.