The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a plea seeking a review of its judgment on electoral bonds. The order, passed by a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli, noted that the petitioners had not raised any new grounds that would warrant a review of the judgment. The petitioners had argued that the electoral bond scheme was leading to the erosion of transparency in political funding, and that the Court should review its judgment to ensure that the scheme is not misused. However, the Supreme Court observed that the petitioners had not raised any new grounds that would warrant a review of the judgment, and that the Court should not interfere in the matter without sufficient reason. The Supreme Court's decision is significant, as it highlights the importance of finality in judicial decisions. The electoral bond scheme has been a contentious issue in India, with many arguing that it is necessary to ensure transparency in political funding, while others argue that it will lead to the erosion of transparency and the misuse of funds. The Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the plea suggests that the Court is keen to ensure that its judgments are final and binding, and that it will not interfere in matters without sufficient reason. The posting of the matter for dismissal will bring an end to the litigation, and it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the issue. The Supreme Court's observation that the petitioners had not raised any new grounds that would warrant a review of the judgment is noteworthy, as it suggests that the Court is keen to ensure that its judgments are final and binding. The Court's decision to dismiss the plea will be seen as a setback for those who have been advocating for a review of the judgment on electoral bonds, but it also highlights the importance of finality in judicial decisions.