The Supreme Court of India has recently ruled on the maintainability of a plea challenging the election of the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. Background: The case arose from a petition filed by a Member of Parliament, who contested the election of the Deputy Chairman on the grounds of alleged irregularities. Parties: The petitioner argued that the election was vitiated by procedural lapses, while the respondent contended that the petition was not maintainable due to the absence of a specific provision in the Constitution or the Rules of Procedure. Legal issues: The court examined the scope of judicial review in the context of parliamentary elections, focusing on the interplay between the Constitution, the Rules of Procedure, and the principles of natural justice. Court observations: The Supreme Court observed that the election of the Deputy Chairman is a proceeding that is amenable to judicial review, but only to the extent of examining whether the procedure followed was in consonance with the Rules of Procedure. Significance: This judgment has significant implications for the functioning of Parliament and the role of the judiciary in ensuring the integrity of parliamentary processes, as it clarifies the scope of judicial review in such matters.