The Gujarat High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a ban on liquor in the state, observing that the issue was already being considered by the government. Background: The petitioner had approached the court seeking a ban on liquor, citing its impact on public health and morality. Parties: The petitioner was represented by advocate Anand Yagnik, while the state government was represented by advocate Manisha Shah. Legal issues: The court considered the provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, and the principles of public policy. Court observations: The court observed that the issue was already being considered by the government and that the petitioner had not made out a case for judicial intervention. Significance: The judgment highlights the importance of the separation of powers between the judiciary and the executive, and the need for the judiciary to exercise restraint in matters of policy. It also underscores the need for the government to take proactive steps to address social issues, rather than relying on judicial intervention.