The Supreme Court of India has ruled that daughters have equal rights in Hindu undivided family property. The court ruled that the amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which gave daughters equal rights in ancestral property, is applicable with retrospective effect. The judgment was delivered by a bench of three judges, which was hearing a petition challenging the amendment. The petitioners had argued that the amendment should only apply prospectively and not retrospectively. The court disagreed with the petitioners and ruled that the amendment is applicable with retrospective effect. The judgment has significant implications for Hindu families, where property is often held in the name of the family rather than individual members. The court's decision is expected to bring about greater equality and fairness in the distribution of property among family members. The judgment is a major victory for women's rights activists, who have been arguing that daughters should have equal rights in ancestral property. The court's decision is also expected to have significant implications for the rights of women in other areas of law, including inheritance and succession. The judgment has been welcomed by lawyers and activists, who have been arguing that the law should be reformed to give daughters equal rights in ancestral property. The court's decision is a significant development in the ongoing debate about the need for greater equality and fairness in the distribution of property among family members. The judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for Hindu families and is a major step forward in the protection of women's rights. The court's decision is also expected to have significant implications for the rights of women in other areas of law, including inheritance and succession. The judgment has sparked a debate about the need for further reforms in the law to give women greater equality and fairness in the distribution of property.