BREAKING| Supreme Court Issues Fresh Guidelines For Senior D

Card image

BREAKING| Supreme Court Issues Fresh Guidelines For Senior Designation; Previous Applicants Required To Update Or Submit Fresh Applications

By Team EOS |

The Supreme Court has issued fresh guidelines for the designation of senior advocates following the May 12 judgment in Indira Jaising vs Supreme Court which modified the criteria for senior designation.

The Court has directed that Advocates-on-Record/Advocates who had applied in response to Notice/s dated 25 February 2022 and 7 May, 2022, for conferment of designation as Senior Advocate have to either :

(i) to update their previous applications pending consideration of the Permanent Committee by furnishing additional information/data in the newly prescribed format.

(ii) to substitute their applications by submitting fresh applications in the new prescribed format, or.

(iii) to withdraw their applications by Monday, 07 August 2023 without, in any manner, affecting their entitlement to apply for designation to any High Court or to the Supreme Court, as and when application would be invited in future.

The Court has also invited fresh applications from former Chief Justices and Judges of High Courts who are desirous of being considered for senior designation.

The Senior Designations will be dealt with by a committee comprising :

a) Chief Justice of India : Chairperson.

(b) Two senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court of India : Members.

( c) Attorney General for India : Member

( d) A member of the Bar, nominated by the Chairperson and Members, referred to in (a) to ( c) above : Member.

The names shortlisted by the Committee will be placed before the Full Court. There shall be no voting by secret ballot save in an exceptional situation, for reasons to be recorded. In the Indira Jaising judgment, the Court had ordered that secret voting should be an exception.

Who are eligible to apply?

(i) At least

(a) ten years’ standing as an Advocate; or

(b) ten years’ combined standing as an Advocate and as a District and Sessions Judge or as a Judicial Member of any Tribunal in India whose qualification for eligibility for such appointment is not less than that prescribed for appointment as a District Judge.

(ii) Practice mainly in the Supreme Court.

Note: Applicant-advocates having domain expertise of practising before specialized Tribunals may be given concession with regard to the extent of appearances in the Supreme Court.

(iii) Attainment of the age of 45 years, unless the age limit is relaxed by the Committee, or the name has been recommended by the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Criteria

In the Indira Jaising judgment, the Supreme Court had reduced the marks awarded for criteria like publications and also included aspects like teaching assignments or guest lectures. The points for notable reported/unreported judgments and pro-bono work has been increased by 10 to make it 50(earlier it was 40).

The criteria is now :

1 Number of years of practice of the applicant-Advocate from 20 the date of enrolment – 20.

( 10 points for 10 years of practice and 1 point each for every additional year of practice, subject to a maximum of 20 points).

2 Judgments reported and unreported ( excluding orders that 50 do not lay down any principle of law); pro bono work done by the Advocate; domain expertise (such as constitutional law, Inter-State Water Disputes, Criminal law, Arbitration law, Corporate law, Family law, Human Rights, Public Interest Litigation, International law, law relating to women) of the applicant-Advocate. – 50.

3 Publication of academic articles, experience of teaching assignments in the field of law, guest lectures delivered in law schools and professional institutions connected with law – 5

4 The test of personality and suitability on the basis of interview for a holistic assessment of the applicant – 25

Applications to be invited at least once a year

The Secretariat of the Committee will initiate the process for designation of Senior Advocate at least once every year by inviting applications from Advocates-on-Record/ Advocates for designation as Senior Advocates.

The Secretariat will publish the proposals received for designation on the official website of the Supreme Court and invite suggestions/views of other stakeholders on the proposals for designation.

The new guidelines can be ReadSource

Latest News Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Startups and Legal Compliance: A Guide to Navigating Indian Laws

Navigating legal compliance is crucial for startups to establish a strong foundation and ensure sustainable growth. In India, understanding and adhering to applicable laws can be complex but essential. Here’s a concise guide to help startups stay compliant: 1. Incorporation ...

Card image

5 Mistakes People Make While Buying Property in India

Buying property is one of the biggest financial decisions in India.But are you sure you are not making a mistake that could cost you years of litigation or financial loss? Many buyers focus only on location and price, while ignoring ...

Card image

Supreme Court Stays High Court Order On Old Pension Scheme For Paramilitary Forces

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the Delhi High Court judgment which held that the old pension scheme (OPS) will be implemented in the Central Paramilitary Forces (CAPF). During a brief hearing, a bench of Justices Sanjeev Khanna and Bela ...

Card image

Muzaffarnagar slapping case: SC pulls up UP govt over delay in student counselling

After perusing the state reply Friday, the bench said it reflected that the counselling process had not been done yet. “It is not reflected, it is not being done,” said Justice Oka. The Supreme Court Friday pulled up the Uttar ...

Card image

SC : Divorce Can Be Granted On ‘Grounds Of Irretrievable Breakdown’

The Supreme Court on May 1 held that it can use its extraordinary powers to do “complete justice” under Article 142 of the Constitution and dissolve a marriage on the ground of ‘irretrievable breakdown’ of the union. Usually, the apex ...

Card image

Stop Misleading Advertisements, Will Impose Rs 1 Crore Cost On Every Product Claiming False Cure: Supreme Court To Patanjali Ayurved

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (November 21) reprimanded the Patanjali Ayurved for continuing to publish misleading claims and advertisements against modern systems of medicine. While considering a petition filed by the Indian Medical Association against misleading advertisements, the bench comprising ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law