BREAKING| Supreme Court Issues Fresh Guidelines For Senior D

Card image

BREAKING| Supreme Court Issues Fresh Guidelines For Senior Designation; Previous Applicants Required To Update Or Submit Fresh Applications

By Team EOS |

The Supreme Court has issued fresh guidelines for the designation of senior advocates following the May 12 judgment in Indira Jaising vs Supreme Court which modified the criteria for senior designation.

The Court has directed that Advocates-on-Record/Advocates who had applied in response to Notice/s dated 25 February 2022 and 7 May, 2022, for conferment of designation as Senior Advocate have to either :

(i) to update their previous applications pending consideration of the Permanent Committee by furnishing additional information/data in the newly prescribed format.

(ii) to substitute their applications by submitting fresh applications in the new prescribed format, or.

(iii) to withdraw their applications by Monday, 07 August 2023 without, in any manner, affecting their entitlement to apply for designation to any High Court or to the Supreme Court, as and when application would be invited in future.

The Court has also invited fresh applications from former Chief Justices and Judges of High Courts who are desirous of being considered for senior designation.

The Senior Designations will be dealt with by a committee comprising :

a) Chief Justice of India : Chairperson.

(b) Two senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court of India : Members.

( c) Attorney General for India : Member

( d) A member of the Bar, nominated by the Chairperson and Members, referred to in (a) to ( c) above : Member.

The names shortlisted by the Committee will be placed before the Full Court. There shall be no voting by secret ballot save in an exceptional situation, for reasons to be recorded. In the Indira Jaising judgment, the Court had ordered that secret voting should be an exception.

Who are eligible to apply?

(i) At least

(a) ten years’ standing as an Advocate; or

(b) ten years’ combined standing as an Advocate and as a District and Sessions Judge or as a Judicial Member of any Tribunal in India whose qualification for eligibility for such appointment is not less than that prescribed for appointment as a District Judge.

(ii) Practice mainly in the Supreme Court.

Note: Applicant-advocates having domain expertise of practising before specialized Tribunals may be given concession with regard to the extent of appearances in the Supreme Court.

(iii) Attainment of the age of 45 years, unless the age limit is relaxed by the Committee, or the name has been recommended by the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Criteria

In the Indira Jaising judgment, the Supreme Court had reduced the marks awarded for criteria like publications and also included aspects like teaching assignments or guest lectures. The points for notable reported/unreported judgments and pro-bono work has been increased by 10 to make it 50(earlier it was 40).

The criteria is now :

1 Number of years of practice of the applicant-Advocate from 20 the date of enrolment – 20.

( 10 points for 10 years of practice and 1 point each for every additional year of practice, subject to a maximum of 20 points).

2 Judgments reported and unreported ( excluding orders that 50 do not lay down any principle of law); pro bono work done by the Advocate; domain expertise (such as constitutional law, Inter-State Water Disputes, Criminal law, Arbitration law, Corporate law, Family law, Human Rights, Public Interest Litigation, International law, law relating to women) of the applicant-Advocate. – 50.

3 Publication of academic articles, experience of teaching assignments in the field of law, guest lectures delivered in law schools and professional institutions connected with law – 5

4 The test of personality and suitability on the basis of interview for a holistic assessment of the applicant – 25

Applications to be invited at least once a year

The Secretariat of the Committee will initiate the process for designation of Senior Advocate at least once every year by inviting applications from Advocates-on-Record/ Advocates for designation as Senior Advocates.

The Secretariat will publish the proposals received for designation on the official website of the Supreme Court and invite suggestions/views of other stakeholders on the proposals for designation.

The new guidelines can be ReadSource

Latest News Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Remote Work and Employment Law in India: Navigating Legal Implications for Employers and Employees

Remote Work and Employment Law in India: Navigating Legal Implications for Employers and Employees The rise of remote work, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has fundamentally changed the way businesses operate and employees engage with their work. While remote work ...

Card image

Digital Arrest: Navigating Cyber Crime Laws in India

In today's digital era, the concept of "digital arrest" has taken center stage, reflecting the evolving legal response to cyber crimes in India. With the rise in online fraud, hacking, cyberbullying, and identity theft, the need to protect citizens and ...

Card image

S. 50 NDPS Act Not Applicable To Recovery From Bag Carried By A Person: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that the conditions for personal search as specified in Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act are applicable only for the search of the physical body of the person and not for ...

Card image

36-48 Hours Shifts For Resident Doctors Inhuman: Supreme Court Asks NTF To Address Concerns On Duty Hours

During the Suo Motu hearing of the RG Kar Hospital Rape-Murder today, the Supreme Court expressed its worries over the 'inhuman working hours' of resident doctors all over the country.  The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices ...

Card image

Parliament Passes Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill, 2023

After opposition walked out over their demands for discussion on Manipur Violence, the Rajya Sabha passed the contentious Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill, 2023 today. It aims to amend certain provisions under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, to extend and exempt ...

Card image

Can’t Seek Immunity From Legal Provisions Because Contract In President’s Name: SC

Defending the Centre, ASG argued that the contract in the case stands on a different footing as it is entered into in the name of the President.The Union of India cannot demand an immunity from the operation of pertinent legal ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law