Won’t interfere with firecracker ban in Delhi: SC

Won’t interfere with firecracker ban in Delhi: SC

Won’t interfere with firecracker ban in Delhi: SC

Ahead of the festive season, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said that it would not interfere with a decision of a state government if it decides to impose a complete ban on firecrackers, including green crackers, to check pollution level and people should find other ways to celebrate.

NEW DELHI: Ahead of the festive season, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said that it would not interfere with a decision of a state government if it decides to impose a complete ban on firecrackers, including green crackers, to check pollution level and people should find other ways to celebrate.

A bench of Justices A S Bopanna and M M Sundresh passed the observation when an advocate appearing for BJP MP Manoj Tiwari submitted that many state governments, including that of West Bengal and Delhi, had imposed a total ban on firecrackers last year and it was against the order of the apex court. He said that the top court had banned only more polluting firecrackers but allowed green crackers and a total ban should not be imposed.

“As per the Supreme Court verdict, green crackers are allowed but a complete ban was imposed last year in Delhi and West Bengal. It was the Calcutta High Court which had last year clarified that there was no ban on green crackers. There are many states which are imposing complete ban despite the order of this court,” the lawyer appearing for the politician submitted.

The bench, however, was not convinced and virtually favoured total ban if it is required to be done to check life threatening pollution levels. "If government decides to ban then there is a ban. We will not interfere," the bench said.

"If you feel like bursting crackers then go to a state where it is allowed...do something for people. You should be telling your supporters not to do it," the bench said.

The bench also raised questions on how political parties manage to procure “joint firecrackers” and burst them to celebrate election victory as they are banned and the Centre also submitted manufacturing and sale of “joint firecrackers” are not allowed. "You can celebrate victory in different ways," the bench observed.

The apex court has been hearing since 2015 a batch of petitions pertaining to firecrackers and imposed a blanket ban on their sale in the National Capital Region in November 2016 directing the Centre to suspend all licences allowing sale of fireworks. Later on, SC extended the ban to across the country and allowed only green crackers. As its ban order was not effective, SC had in 2021 directed that top bureaucrats including chief secretary and the police commissioner of concerned area and other officials shall be held personally liable for violation of its order.

Additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for Centre, told the bench that a mechanism has been put in place to keep a check on manufacturing and sale of polluting crackers and to take punitive measures. It said that necessary training has been imparted to more than 1,000 manufacturers for producing green crackers and labs have been set up to check composition of crackers. She submitted that regulatory mechanism, covering all steps from approval of formula of green crackers to its manufacture, sale and usage along with the updated safeguard, is in place.

At the end of hearing, the bench asked Delhi police to respond on action taken by it to implement its order. The hearing would continue on Thursday.

Source

 

Latest News Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

Section 313 CrPC | 'Right To Remain Silent Not Be Used Against Accused' : Supreme Court Summarises 12 Principles

Recently, the Supreme Court, in a noteworthy judgment, while acquitting a woman accused of killing her own child and was convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, also decided the question of what may be required of the convict ...

Card image

'No right for queer couples to jointly adopt’: SC in same-sex marriage verdict

The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting.Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, while announcing his verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding legal status to same-sex marriages, today struck down the Central Adoption Resource Authority's (CARA) ...

Card image

SC On Aadhaar: Important Takeaways From The Recent Verdict

The Supreme Court ruled that Aadhaar, the ambitious public scheme that uses biometric data to generate unique identification numbers for citizens, is constitutionally valid, but with conditions. Here are the key takeaways from today’s verdict. Read More >

Card image

Navigating Cyber Crime Laws in India: A Legal Perspective

The rapid proliferation of digital technologies has transformed India’s social, economic, and professional landscape. While digitalization brings efficiency and innovation, it also exposes individuals and businesses to cybercrime risks. As a lawyer in India, it is crucial to understand the ...

Card image

Personal Data Protection Bill: Implications for Businesses and Individuals

The Personal Data Protection Bill (PDP Bill) is a transformative piece of legislation aimed at safeguarding personal data and ensuring privacy in India. Here’s a concise overview of its key provisions and implications for businesses and individuals. Key Provisions of ...

Card image

NEET-PG : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Reduction Of NEET-PG 2023 Qualifying Percentile To Zero

The Supreme Court on Monday (September 25) dismissed a petition challenging the decision of the Union Government to reduce the cut-off for post-graduate medical college admissions through NEET-PG 2023 exam as zero percentile. A bench comprising dismissed a PIL filed ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law