Won’t interfere with firecracker ban in Delhi: SC

Card image

Won’t interfere with firecracker ban in Delhi: SC

By Team EOS |

Ahead of the festive season, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said that it would not interfere with a decision of a state government if it decides to impose a complete ban on firecrackers, including green crackers, to check pollution level and people should find other ways to celebrate.

NEW DELHI: Ahead of the festive season, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said that it would not interfere with a decision of a state government if it decides to impose a complete ban on firecrackers, including green crackers, to check pollution level and people should find other ways to celebrate.

A bench of Justices A S Bopanna and M M Sundresh passed the observation when an advocate appearing for BJP MP Manoj Tiwari submitted that many state governments, including that of West Bengal and Delhi, had imposed a total ban on firecrackers last year and it was against the order of the apex court. He said that the top court had banned only more polluting firecrackers but allowed green crackers and a total ban should not be imposed.

“As per the Supreme Court verdict, green crackers are allowed but a complete ban was imposed last year in Delhi and West Bengal. It was the Calcutta High Court which had last year clarified that there was no ban on green crackers. There are many states which are imposing complete ban despite the order of this court,” the lawyer appearing for the politician submitted.

The bench, however, was not convinced and virtually favoured total ban if it is required to be done to check life threatening pollution levels. "If government decides to ban then there is a ban. We will not interfere," the bench said.

"If you feel like bursting crackers then go to a state where it is allowed...do something for people. You should be telling your supporters not to do it," the bench said.

The bench also raised questions on how political parties manage to procure “joint firecrackers” and burst them to celebrate election victory as they are banned and the Centre also submitted manufacturing and sale of “joint firecrackers” are not allowed. "You can celebrate victory in different ways," the bench observed.

The apex court has been hearing since 2015 a batch of petitions pertaining to firecrackers and imposed a blanket ban on their sale in the National Capital Region in November 2016 directing the Centre to suspend all licences allowing sale of fireworks. Later on, SC extended the ban to across the country and allowed only green crackers. As its ban order was not effective, SC had in 2021 directed that top bureaucrats including chief secretary and the police commissioner of concerned area and other officials shall be held personally liable for violation of its order.

Additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for Centre, told the bench that a mechanism has been put in place to keep a check on manufacturing and sale of polluting crackers and to take punitive measures. It said that necessary training has been imparted to more than 1,000 manufacturers for producing green crackers and labs have been set up to check composition of crackers. She submitted that regulatory mechanism, covering all steps from approval of formula of green crackers to its manufacture, sale and usage along with the updated safeguard, is in place.

At the end of hearing, the bench asked Delhi police to respond on action taken by it to implement its order. The hearing would continue on Thursday.

Source

 

Latest News Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

ADR in Workplace Conflicts A Guide for Employers and Employees...

Workplace conflicts are inevitable Whether stemming from miscommunication differences in expectations or interpersonal issues they can disrupt the professional environment and affect productivity For both employers and employees finding a way to resolve these conflicts quickly fairly and cost-effectively is...

Card image

Be Vigilant Before Invoking Stringent Laws Like SC-ST Act Supreme Court Reminds Police Officers...

In a recent case the Supreme Court reminded police officers of their duty to be vigilant before invoking provisions of stringent laws such as the SC-ST Prevention of Atrocities Act stating that officers must be satisfied that the provisions apply...

Card image

Mediation vs Arbitration Choosing the Right Path in ADR...

Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR has become an increasingly popular method for resolving disputes outside of traditional court litigation Among the various ADR methods mediation and arbitration stand out as two of the most commonly used approaches While both aim to...

Card image

Adoption Rights for LGBTQ Couples Legal Challenges in India...

We recognize that the right to adopt is one of the most debated and sensitive issues for LGBTQ couples in India Despite increasing societal awareness and progressive judicial rulings the Indian legal framework still presents substantial challenges for LGBTQ individuals...

Card image

In A First Supreme Court Data Available On National Judicial Data Grid On Real...

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud announced today that the Supreme Court is officially 'onboard' with the National Judicial Data Grid NJDG now The CJI described the onboarding of the Supreme Court data on NJDG portal under the court's 'open...

Card image

UPSC CSE No Interim Relief Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Expeditiously Decide On...

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide expeditiously the Plea nbsp seeking reduction in the cut off from to for qualifying Part II CSAT exam of Civil Services Examination conducted by UPSC...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law