The Supreme Court on Friday (13.10.2023), raised serious concerns over the delays in the adoption process and the potential impact on both aspiring parents and children in need of loving homes. The remarks came from a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the simplification of adoption procedures in the country, filed by "The Temple of Healing," a charitable trust.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati requested additional time to file a response to the PIL, which prompted Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to express his apprehension. He raised questions about the delays in the adoption process, highlighting that it has virtually come to a standstill, leaving couples waiting for years.
The CJI further emphasised on the effects of bureaucratic delays on individuals and families. He asserted–"
Suppose someone wants to adopt at 35, they get delayed and now they are 39, 40, they may feel that it is too late to adopt. Parental position changes. We understand that possibly there is an element of misuse that you are apprehending but why are you stalling adoptions? There are hundreds and thousands of children waiting for adoption.
ASG Bhati responded by highlighting that there had been issues in identifying children available for adoption, suggesting that the court may want to provide for two more weeks.
Dr. Piyush Saxena (petitioner-in-person) appeared for the Temple of Healing. He highlighted that as per Section 56(3) of the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act, the JJ Act did not apply to adoptions carried out under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA), 1956. He argued that on the ground level, children were not being adopted as the officers in-charge of adoption for juveniles were being "doubly cautious".
The figure of 4000 adoptions against a figure of 3.1 crore children waiting to be adopted – these are not my figures, these are the figures of Parliamentary committee of the Rajya Sabha," he said.
Reiterating his submission, Saxena stated–
CJI asked–
Ms Bhati, you tell us how many children are being adopted...
The bench then stated that it will go through the written submissions in a greater detail. Eventually, the bench told the ASG that she had to "sit with CARA" and explain the consequences of the delay.
The matter will now be taken up on next Friday.
Introduction: The financial landscape for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) is complex, spanning a myriad of regulations, taxes, and investment opportunities. As global citizens, NRIs navigate diverse economic ecosystems, balancing rights and responsibilities across borders. In this article, we delve into the ...
The Supreme Court has held that if an Indian Entity’s Establishment is operating in Oman and has a ‘Permanent Establishment’ status under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (“DTAA”), then the dividend income received by the Indian Entity from such Establishment would ...
The Supreme Court on Monday (26.09.2023), held that an officer of the Railway Protection Force (RPF) can seek compensation under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 even though the RPF has been declared to be an armed force of the Union. “..in ...
The journey toward equality for LGBTQ+ communities in India has been marked by significant legal and social milestones. From the decriminalization of same-sex relationships to ongoing debates about marriage equality and adoption rights, the evolution of LGBTQ+ rights reflects the ...
Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachudrecently spoke on how no technology is neutral and how it can reflect human values when deployed in the real world. The CJI spoke on how one must ponder the human and societal values ...
In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, the legal industry stands at the precipice of transformation. As advancements in technology redefine the way we work, communicate, and interact, the realm of law is not immune to these revolutionary changes. At Eos ...