Section 313 CrPC | 'Right To Remain Silent Not Be Used Again

Card image

Section 313 CrPC | 'Right To Remain Silent Not Be Used Against Accused' : Supreme Court Summarises 12 Principles

By Admin |

Recently, the Supreme Court, in a noteworthy judgment, while acquitting a woman accused of killing her own child and was convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, also decided the question of what may be required of the convict in her statement under Section 313 Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C).

Citing extensive thread of precedents, the Top Court penned down the following principles.

  • The object, evident from the Section itself, is to enable the accused to themselves explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against them. 
  • The intent is to establish a dialogue between the Court and the accused. This process benefits the accused and aids the Court in arriving at the final verdict. 
  • The process enshrined is not a matter of procedural formality but is based on the cardinal principle of natural justice, i.e., 
  • The ultimate test when concerned with the compliance of the Section is to enquire and ensure whether the accused got the opportunity to say his piece. 
  • In such a statement, the accused may or may not admit involvement or any incriminating circumstance or may even offer an alternative version of events or interpretation. The accused may not be put to prejudice by any omission or inadequate questioning. 
  • The right to remain silent or any answer to a question which may be false shall not be used to his detriment, being the sole reason. 
  • This statement cannot form the sole basis of conviction and is neither a substantive nor a substitute piece of evidence. It does not discharge but reduces the prosecution's burden of leading evidence to prove its case. They are to be used to examine the veracity of the prosecution's case. 
  • This statement is to be read as a whole. One part cannot be read in isolation. 
  • Such a statement, as not on oath, does not qualify as a piece of evidence under Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; however, the inculpatory aspect as may be borne from the statement may be used to lend credence to the case of the prosecution. 
  • The circumstances not put to the accused while rendering his statement under the Section are to be excluded from consideration as no opportunity has been afforded to him to explain them. 
  • The Court is obligated to put, in the form of questions, all incriminating circumstances to the accused so as to give him an opportunity to articulate his defence. The defence so articulated must be carefully scrutinized and considered. 
  • Non-compliance with the Section may cause prejudice to the accused and may impede the process of arriving at a fair decision.

It may be noted that, in the instant case, the case of the prosecution was that the convict (appellant) had relations with a co-villager, namely, Baiga Gond, as a result of which she conceived a child. She, upon giving birth, allegedly killed this child and threw the corpse into a dabri (small water bodypond).

In the Section 313 CrPC statement, the accused had admitted that she was pregnant. Since the accused was living alone, the trial court made further inferences from her admission of pregnancy and proceeded to hold her guilty of the murder of the child.

The Supreme Court took a critical view of the approach taken by the trial court, which was affirmed by the High Court.

In the context of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court said : "Although there is a requirement by law to disclose the aspects required to adjudicate in a criminal matter such duty cannot unreasonably and unwarrantedly step over the fundamental right of privacy."

Latest News Latest Supreme Court
Search Here

Latest Posts

Card image

Cheque Case Against Firm s Partner Can Be Quashed Only On Strong Evidence That...

The Supreme Court observed that a cheque case against a partner of the firm cannot be quashed under Section CrPC unless there is unimpeachable and incontrovertible evidence that he she did not have any concern with the issuance of cheques...

Card image

Evolving Social and Constitutional Rights for LGBTQ Communities...

The journey toward equality for LGBTQ communities in India has been marked by significant legal and social milestones From the decriminalization of same-sex relationships to ongoing debates about marriage equality and adoption rights the evolution of LGBTQ rights reflects the...

Card image

UPSC CSE No Interim Relief Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Expeditiously Decide On...

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide expeditiously the Plea nbsp seeking reduction in the cut off from to for qualifying Part II CSAT exam of Civil Services Examination conducted by UPSC...

Card image

New Training Programme For New Lawyers By Chief Justice Of India DY CHANDRACHUD...

lsquo Judges can rsquo t burden lawyers due to uneasiness with technology rsquo CJI Chandrachud- CJI Chandrachud appealed to judges to continue hybrid hearings saying that this was not just meant for the Covid- pandemic period Chief Justice of India...

Card image

- Hours Shifts For Resident Doctors Inhuman Supreme Court Asks NTF To Address Concerns...

During the Suo Motu hearing of the RG Kar Hospital Rape-Murder today the Supreme Court expressed its worries over the 'inhuman working hours' of resident doctors all over the country nbsp The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud...

Card image

Empowering Dispute Resolution How Technology is Shaping the Future of ADR...

The Role of Technology in Enhancing ADR Processes The advent of technology has transformed virtually every industry and the field of Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR is no exception ADR processes including mediation arbitration and negotiation have traditionally relied on...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law