The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting.
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, while announcing his verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding legal status to same-sex marriages, today struck down the Central Adoption Resource Authority's (CARA) regulation that restricted queer and unmarried couples from adopting children. The five-judge bench, however, in a 3:2 verdict, ruled that non-heterosexual couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.
CJI Chandrachud said it couldn't be assumed only "heterosexual married couples can be good parents".
CARA is a statutory body affiliated to the Ministry of Women and Child Development. It is the nodal body for adoption of Indian children. It regulates and monitors all adoptions taking place in India, including inter-country adoptions.
The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting, and that the Union of India hadn't proven restricting unmarried couples from adopting was in the best interest of children. "CARA has exceeded its authority in barring unmarried couples," he said.
"Differentia between married couples and unmarried couples has no reasonable nexus with the objective of CARA - the best interests of the child," CJI Chandrachud said.
He said the CARA circular (which excludes queer couples from adoption) is violative of Article 15 of the Constitution, reported Live Law.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to grant legal recognition to same-sax marriages, holding that it is only for Parliament and state legislatures to create such institutions and grant them legal validation.
The Constitution bench -- comprising CJI Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha -- were unanimous in their judgement that it was beyond the remit of courts to issue a positive direction to the legislature to accord legal recognition to same-sex marriages.
The court refused to change the meaning of the Special Marriage Act. However, it declared queer couples have the right to cohabit without any threat of violence, coercion or interference.
Three of the five judges ruled there can't be a right to form civil unions. By the same majority, the court also held that non-heterosexual couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.
Introduction In the intricate world of real estate consumers often find themselves entangled in a web of complexities that demand legal acumen and guidance As a solicitor passionate about serving my clients I feel compelled to shed light on the...
The Supreme Court recently reiterated that the conditions for personal search as specified in Section of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act are applicable only for the search of the physical body of the person and not for...
The Supreme Court Friday held as valid the rules framed by the Bar Council of India requiring candidates seeking enrolment as an advocate to have completed their law course from a college recognized by the top Bar body A vacation...
The Supreme Court has said a five-judge constitution bench will examine whether Parliament can ldquo abrogate the constitutional principles of governance rdquo for the Delhi government by making a law to take away its control over services The Centre recently...
The Supreme Court Bench comprising Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Vikram Nath has held that in order to attract the application of Section of the Transfer of Property Act which requires months rsquo notice for termination of lease...
We recognize that the right to adopt is one of the most debated and sensitive issues for LGBTQ couples in India Despite increasing societal awareness and progressive judicial rulings the Indian legal framework still presents substantial challenges for LGBTQ individuals...