'No right for queer couples to jointly adopt’: SC in same-

Card image

'No right for queer couples to jointly adopt’: SC in same-sex marriage verdict

By Team EOS |

The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, while announcing his verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding legal status to same-sex marriages, today struck down the Central Adoption Resource Authority's (CARA) regulation that restricted queer and unmarried couples from adopting children. The five-judge bench, however, in a 3:2 verdict, ruled that non-heterosexual couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.
CJI Chandrachud said it couldn't be assumed only "heterosexual married couples can be good parents".

CARA is a statutory body affiliated to the Ministry of Women and Child Development. It is the nodal body for adoption of Indian children. It regulates and monitors all adoptions taking place in India, including inter-country adoptions.

The CJI said the law didn't preclude unmarried couples from adopting, and that the Union of India hadn't proven restricting unmarried couples from adopting was in the best interest of children. "CARA has exceeded its authority in barring unmarried couples," he said.

"Differentia between married couples and unmarried couples has no reasonable nexus with the objective of CARA - the best interests of the child," CJI Chandrachud said.

He said the CARA circular (which excludes queer couples from adoption) is violative of Article 15 of the Constitution, reported Live Law.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to grant legal recognition to same-sax marriages, holding that it is only for Parliament and state legislatures to create such institutions and grant them legal validation.

The Constitution bench -- comprising CJI Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha -- were unanimous in their judgement that it was beyond the remit of courts to issue a positive direction to the legislature to accord legal recognition to same-sex marriages.

The court refused to change the meaning of the Special Marriage Act. However, it declared queer couples have the right to cohabit without any threat of violence, coercion or interference.

Three of the five judges ruled there can't be a right to form civil unions. By the same majority, the court also held that non-heterosexual couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.

 

Latest News Latest Supreme Court

Latest Posts

Card image

Motor Accident Claims No Right To Recovery For Insurer Merely Because Vehicle Owner Didn't...

The Supreme Court on Monday th October held that an insurance company cannot claim that it is not liable to pay compensation in a motor vehicle accident claim just because the vehicle owner did not verify the genuineness of the...

Card image

UPSC CSE No Interim Relief Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Expeditiously Decide On...

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide expeditiously the Plea nbsp seeking reduction in the cut off from to for qualifying Part II CSAT exam of Civil Services Examination conducted by UPSC...

Card image

Grant Of Bail Can't Be Made Dependent On Surrender Of Co-Accused Supreme Court...

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court while allowing a bail plea held that the grant of bail to a co-accused person cannot be contingent on the surrender of another accused who is also pertinently the main accused in the...

Card image

...

Why Legal Due Diligence is Crucial Before Any Business Merger Planning a merger or acquisition Don rsquo t skip legal due diligence mdash it can make or break the deal Here rsquo s why What is Legal Due Diligence It...

Card image

Supreme Court Notice To Airlines Regulator Over Pee-Gate Victim s Petition...

New Delhi nbsp The Supreme Court Monday agreed to examine the plea of a -year-old woman on whom a male co-passenger allegedly urinated on board an Air India flight in November last year seeking a direction to the Centre aviation...

Card image

Stop Misleading Advertisements Will Impose Rs Crore Cost On Every Product Claiming False Cure...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday November reprimanded the Patanjali Ayurved for continuing to publish misleading claims and advertisements against modern systems of medicine While considering a petition filed by the Indian Medical Association against misleading advertisements the bench comprising...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law